Mentions
What was said, and which frame it usedEvery item the dashboard counts, newest first. The marked words are the phrases that made it count; the tags say whether it used an opposing frame, an MMT-consistent idea, or named MMT. These are keyword matches: whether an item endorses or attacks an idea is shown once our classifier's accuracy is published.
-
Nigel Farage says charities that help asylum seekers reach UK should be prosecuted
…: “Do you believe in criminal penalties for those who facilitated this invasion of the English Isles?” Farage replied: “Totally, totally. The role of the NGOs, the role of those that are sponsored by taxpayers’ money, because they’re nice, they’re good, they’re kind. They have actually aided and abetted criminality in absolutely every way. “These are people [who are] are deluded – deluded, hard-left socialist Marxists, who don’t believe in countries, don’t believe in borders, don’t believe in identities, are intent on destroying everything that exists.” Farage has previously described the RN…
- Opposing frame: Taxpayers' money
-
How Europe’s most wanted cocaine trafficker turned Sierra Leone into the world’s first true narco state
…cocaine importer – the EU agreed to give an extra €90m to Sierra Leone. In January 2025, another €35m was unlocked at a Freetown meeting with EU officials. Other deals involved tens of millions of EU taxpayers’ money paid directly into Sierra Leone’s treasury. After the Arconian seizure, on 9 June 2026, Brussels opened the European chamber of commerce in Freetown to boost investment. Its inaugural president was the Sierra Leonean head of the shipping company whose employee John Conteh died at Freetown’s port. Strengthening democracy was a core ambition of European investment in Sierra Leone.…
- Opposing frame: Taxpayers' money
-
UK Coach Industry
…here has been for buses. Before the Minister, off the back of the spending review, heads off to develop such a scheme for coaches—there has been one for buses—I again make the case that when we spend taxpayers’ money to help this sector, and the broader transport sector, we must ensure that operators relying on Government intervention benefit, not bash, our domestic manufacturing industry. Too often, quick decisions and poorly designed schemes have seen money sent to Chinese manufacturers, with a subsequent loss of domestic jobs and undercutting of the UK industrial capacity that could help…
- Opposing frame: Taxpayers' money
-
Health Bill
…ble Lords share the desire to ensure that the modernisation and reform of healthcare leads to better outcomes for patients and a more productive, efficient and accountable NHS, and improves value for taxpayers’ money. In the time available, I will focus on three issues relating to women’s health; I know that, in her role as Women’s Health Minister, the Minister has a clear focus on this. I turn first to the Government’s commitment to introduce an amendment to the Bill to appoint a maternity and neonatal commissioner. As the Minister stated, this was a recommendation from the final report of…
- Opposing frame: Taxpayers' money
-
Northern Ireland Troubles Bill (Carry-over Extension)
…me the punishment. With a minimum cost of £20 million, on average, and a maximum cost of £20 million per inquest, the total equates, as one Policy Exchange paper put it, to in excess of £1 billion of taxpayers’ money. On the other hand, we have the legacy commission. Let us build it. Let us make it better. Let us make it the single route to truth, reconciliation and justice. It has more investigative powers, it can move faster and it will bring the end state at a delivery cost of a fraction of that of inquests. What other country delivers reconciliation through a twin-track approach? It just…
- Opposing frame: Taxpayers' money
-
Pensions Triple Lock
The SNP wasted more than £28 million of taxpayers’ money on social care plans that went nowhere: no improvement to outcomes, no improvement to the terms and conditions of social care workers in Scotland. Now, the SNP is trying to hoodwink my constituents by telling them that these plans would make them worse off. The plans would increase Barnett consequentials for Scotland, which could be spent on a national care service. Will the Secretary of State learn from the SNP’s failures and reassure my constituents?
- Opposing frame: Taxpayers' money
-
Heathrow’s third runway is a bottomless money pit. Stop it now
It won’t promote growth, will take decades and will swallow up billions of taxpayers’ money, says Guardian columnist Simon Jenkins Infrastructure sends politicians berserk. Propose more money for the health service or reopening youth clubs and frowns break out all round. Can we afford it? But shout infrastructure and cheers go up. The word suggests glamour, chest-beating and “growth”. Reason flies out of the window. The saga of Heathrow’s third runway beggars belief. A foreign-owned private company wants to make more money out of its cramped west London investment. The airlines are sceptical…
- Opposing frame: Fiscal black hole
- Opposing frame: Taxpayers' money
-
Badenoch’s inheritance tax gambit makes no economic sense
The Tory leader’s proposal to slash the tax would shovel £6bn of taxpayer money to the already-wealthy Kemi Badenoch’s inheritance tax gambit is a Conservative classic. After all, it was George Osborne’s high-profile pledge to “take the family home out of inheritance tax” in 2007 that put Gordon Brown off calling a snap general election. In practice, Osborne’s plan involved a £1m threshold for inheritance tax – and given the global financial crisis had blown a hole in the public finances by the time the Conservative-Lib Dem coalition came to power in 2010, it never came to pass. But the promi…
- Opposing frame: Taxpayers' money
-
As it happened: Israel condemns Green party passing ‘Zionism is racism’ as a ‘stain on history of UK’
…incredibly wealthy” people, Badenoch switched the subject to the amount spent on benefits for people not working She replied: This policy is about people at that cliff edge. What is not a good use of taxpayers money is paying thousands and thousands of people who can work, not to work. Kemi Badenoch recorded her interview with Laura Kuenssberg yesterday. It is playing out on the programme now. In it, Badenoch defended her plan to extend free childcare to high earners. (See 9.08am.) She said: What we want to see is that people who work harder don’t get punished for doing so. If you earn £100…
- Opposing frame: Taxpayers' money
-
‘Visible and engaged’: Burnham in listening mode with businesses at Labour party conference
…ay about the budget, despite striking a markedly different tone to Burnham’s “in hock” comment from a year earlier – insisting that he and the prime minister were “in lockstep” in their commitment to balance the books. “There is nothing progressive about losing control because it’s always working people who pay for it,” he said. Shevaun Haviland, the director general of the British Chambers of Commerce, said Healey’s speech was “significant” because the chancellor had acknowledged that private enterprise was vital for helping the UK economy to grow. However, she warned that companies still f…
- Opposing frame: Household budget
- Opposing frame: Taxpayers' money