Mentions
What was said, and which frame it usedEvery item the dashboard counts, newest first. The marked words are the phrases that made it count; the tags say whether it used an opposing frame, an MMT-consistent idea, or named MMT. These are keyword matches: whether an item endorses or attacks an idea is shown once our classifier's accuracy is published.
-
As it happened: Pat McFadden tells Labour activists they should not defend benefits system ‘status quo’ because it ‘writes off’ claimants
…d expessed doubts about the plan in the past. Again, Burnham gave a non-committal answer. Kuenssberg tried a final time and got the same reply. Q: Will you tell us something you are willing to cut to balance the books? Burnham said, if people wait unti his speech on Tuesday, they will see he is “prepared to take those type of decisions because I won’t do what the previous Conservative government did and take risks with the economy”. He said the fundamentals of the economy were moving in the right direction before the Iran war started. And he said John Healey, the chancellor, was clear about…
- Opposing frame: Household budget
-
Andrew Bragg stands by proposed migration limits – even as Liberal colleagues decline to back him in
…also acknowledged the role he played in former Coalition governments, including the Morrison government’s inability to get the federal budget into a promised surplus. “As someone who was a backbencher in the Morrison government, I am sorry I didn’t do more to stop the madness,” he said. “I believe the new liberalism Australia needs isn’t socialism and it isn’t conservatism seeking to turn back the clock. “The madness started when Canberra gave up on the budget … whenever a politician announces more spending, they are stealing from tomorrow because there is no intention to balance the books.”
- Opposing frame: Household budget
- MMT-consistent idea: Deficit myth